March 6, 2020, 3:42 p.m.

They found $5 billion in the couch

Coté's Wunderkammer

They found $5 billion in the couch

I did a calculation like this too quickly and really goofed it up on this week’s Software Defined Talk, doing some double counting (I think?) and otherwise just messing it up all crazy-like. This wild estimate is, hopefully, less wild.

With the sale of Compuware to BMC, I think the PE firm Thoma Bravo made a huge profit in six years. The firm bought Compuware for $2.4bn in 2014, pulled out and IPO’d Dynatrace in July 2019 for a valuation of $8.857bn today , and just sold the rest of Compuware to BMC for, likely, something around $2bn.

It’s that Dynatrace IPO that was the real money maker. What’s mysterious to me, as with most private equity successes, is why the original management team couldn’t unlock all that value.

Compuware purchased Dynatrace in 2011 for $256m. In 2009, Compuware bought Gomez for $295m. These two companies were put into one product suite under the Dynatrace name (I think). So, let’s say the price for building Dynatrace was $551m.

Under Thoma Bravo’s ownership, that investment (plus the ongoing cost of running that business) became an $8.857bn asset. So, like, that’s a massive jump. Also, it’s worth around 4.5x more than the business that used to house it, Compuware.

Let’s do some back of the enveloping on Thoma Bravo’s profit. From the Barron’s article on this and a few other sources, we find:

  • $2bn cash from selling Compuware to BMC.
  • Thoma Bravo has sold and is filing to sell a total of about $700m of Dynatrace stock.
  • After this selling, it’ll still own 51% of Dynatrace (so, a $4.6bn asset - not really super-liquid [I mean, you can just dump that much stock at once and keep the price stable], but still).
  • (I think my SDT calculation screwed up here because I somehow put in the sale of that other 49% at the IPO price - I dunno, something dumb like that.)
  • I’m not sure if Thoma Bravo has previously sold share, I thought I’d found that they had but can’t track it down now.
  • It probably got something like $200m in Dynatrace dividends already.
  • Dynatrace’s CEO says that Thoma Bravo has “never taken a penny out of [Dynatrace],” I’m not sure about Compuware, but we’ll drop such considerations out.

So:

$2bn + $700m + $200m = $2.9bn

And, then, if you add in the $4.6bn in equity they still own in Dynatrace, you come up to $7.5bn. If you subtract out the $2.4bn to buy Compuware, you’re at, like, $5bn in profit…?

I mean, the main thing to look at is the selling price of Compuware (~$2bn) versus Dynatrace’s current valuation ($8.857bn), a difference of $6.8bn found in the couch.

¯_(ツ)_/¯

(Now, the biggest befuddler for this is the interest Thoma Bravo paid on any loans (Dynatrace IPO’ed with $629m in debt) and other fiddly finance things I don’t understand or can account for. But, hey, I’m no professional - I’m just trying to pass the time on a grey Friday afternoon here.)

What’s a TAZNU?

If you want to find out, check out the event VMware is having on March 10th. You can register for it and attend, of course, for free:

Join VMware executives and Kubernetes pioneers in this streamed event as they outline exciting new products and services that will define the next generation of applications.

VMware is launching an incredible new portfolio to support Kubernetes, cloud native architectures and app transformation in your business.

Learn how VMware vSphere, VMware Tanzu and VMware Cloud Foundation will help you deliver better software, more rapidly, for any cloud. Make your developers more productive while unifying operations and security for any cloud.

Check it out!

(Picture from @pczarkowski.)

Original content

Said episode of Software Defined Talk that I made the wildly off calculation in:

With the virus shutting down conferences and keeping people in the home office, we discuss the value of in-person conferences and how remote ones might could be better. Also, GKE’s kubernetes cluster pricing (and Amazon’s drop to match the price) gives us an anchoring point for pricing running a cluster. Coupled with the recent CNCF survey you could make an interesting stew. Finally, Coté tries to run some numbers to figure out how much Thoma Bravo profited from taking Compuware private. (Also, he always mispronounces it as Thom-oh Bravo.)

Listen in!

Relative to your interests

  • Farmers bump up against GPL-bogeyman - ‘To Kenney, the notion that farmers can’t work on their own tractors is an affront to the rugged individualism that built America.’
  • CUI - cycling under the influence - ‘And quarter of cyclists said they had gone home after a night out having had more than two units of alcohol, which could put them over the legal limit.
  • How Working Parents Can Regain Control Over Their Lives
  • 2019 CNCF Survey results are here: Deployments are growing in size and speed as cloud native adoption becomes mainstream - This is, basically, a kubernetes adoption and momentum survey. The survey shows a huge jump in production use from 58% in 2018 to 78% in 2019. Their demographics cover companies of all sizes, but, whichever way you slice the company size, there’s high trust and use in kubernetes.

You just read issue #129 of Coté's Wunderkammer. You can also browse the full archives of this newsletter.

Brought to you by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.